February 08, 2016
Interesting Things on the Internet: February 8th 2016
- Exclusive: Snowden intelligence docs reveal UK spooks' malware checklist "the entire surveillance project has been undertaken in secrecy, within the bubble of people who already think that surveillance is the answer to virtually any question."
February 01, 2016
Interesting Things on the Internet: February 1st 2016
- A Good Death. Touching post from Alex.
- Affective Labour and Digital Collaboration. Interesting post looking at types of work and how they're recognised, prompted by discussions at the RCA's Future Makespaces in Redistributed Manufacturing symposium that I attended last weekend.
- Class (American). "The one great instrument of social mobility in the US is college. But it's not the degree. It's the socialization. College – residential college – is most people's one great shot (or not so great shot) at being socialized into a higher social class." I think this all stands for the UK too. Thought-provoking stuff.
- Sometimes You Break Their Hearts, Sometimes They Break Yours. A lovely short story.
- A nation of slaves.
- The Porous City.
- The fall of Jersey: how a tax haven goes bust. Is Jersey a canary for the rest of the UK?
January 11, 2016
Interesting Things on the Internet: January 11th 2016
- Technology and inequality. Paul Miller provides another great response to the recent Paul Graham essay.
- 10,000 Hours with Reid Hoffman: What I Learned. Lots of good advice in here.
- What to do when you're not the hero any more. "stories are mirrors, but they are also windows. They let you see yourself transfigured, but they also let you live lives you haven’t had the chance to imagine, as many other lives as there are stories yet to be told, without once leaving your chair."
- Year in Review: 2015. "What does capitalism mean when the rate of profit can’t beat the lowest interest rate in history? Money has never been so cheap for so long, and people still can’t think of capital worth investing in."
- We're living the dream; we just don't realize it.
January 10, 2016
The City as Change Vector
When I went to Laptops and Looms II one of the four "things I'd been pondering" was the role cities might play in building a better future. I was reminded of it at Oggcamp recently when I chaired a session about Code for Liverpool, and so thought I'd finally write up some thoughts here.
Above is a photo of the notes I jotted down on the train over to Laptops and Looms. Obviously there's a bit about how we get to the sort of "smart" city that we citizens want, rather than the one that's most profitable for big tech firms (or new tech startups). However, it's the "City as lab?" part that I think is most interesting.
There are many challenges and possibilities facing society today. However, I don't think I'm alone in a general feeling of malaise that we're failing to address any of them.
Actually, it's not that we can't address any of them, it's that there seems to be a limit to the size of project that we can tackle. Kickstarter, pop-ups, artist collectives, hackspaces, etc. mean it's easier than ever to complete certain types of project, yet once you get to a certain size or scale of project we seem to hit a barrier.
As you can see in this highly scientific graph, once we get above the red line we tend to be overwhelmed with the difficulty of tackling things. Dan Hill sums it up well with his comment that you can't crowd-source a light-rail system.
I have a theory (not exactly a new or unique one) that cities are the best environment to tackle the problem of scale.
Although some of these projects - for example, climate change - sound like they're best dealt with at a national or even international level, I think we've had far too much evidence to the contrary. I think - despite all our fawning over technology - we're fundamentally social and interpersonal beings and as our organisations grow in size, that's something that gets lost along the way.
That's why the city is an interesting and fertile ground for new ideas and experiments. It's big enough for newcomers to reinvent themselves, yet small enough that bad actors' deeds are noted and the community can be wary of their actions in future; and it's big enough that successful initiatives can gain the critical mass to transfer elsewhere, yet small enough that individuals and small bands of people can develop the connections and networks to make an impact.
Liverpool as a possibility space
Since moving back to Liverpool this is something I've been half-consciously working towards. Helping to nurture the existing fertile ground for experimentation, social change, and prosperity and open up the city as a possibility space for such initiatives.
And in addition to expanding the DoES community itself we also look to the wider context.
And it also involves an element of JFDI. Hence projects like the "somebody should" list for the whole city, which has started to gain some movement thanks to the more recent Code for Liverpool idea and hackdays.
I don't know what we'll achieve through those and other initiatives, but that's not the point. It's not just down to me, it's also the responsibility of my fellow Liverpudlians, and those who choose to join us. Interesting times indeed.
January 04, 2016
Interesting Things on the Internet: January 4th 2016
- The Resistance. Voices dissenting the techno-utopians.
- Tell me who you are. Excellent (but long) essay about identity. How do you change your password when your password is your fingerprint?
- The Website Obesity Crisis. Another Maciej talk, another must read/watch.
- “If creativity is the field, copyright is the fence.” Copyright extension is just rent extraction.
- 5 things the media does to manufacture outrage. Must feed the news cycle... (n.b. I haven't checked the sources in this article, so it's possible it's just a massive troll...)
- Hacking the City. A new model for urban renewal. A good overview of the work Renew Newcastle (that's the Australian one, not one of the UK Newcastles) is doing.
- Machining of brass again. A write up from Julian, a friend of mine who's been working on a new CNC mill here at DoES Liverpool. Mostly included here for this paragraph: "Recall that, after 20 years writing the software that generates CNC toolpaths, I’d not ever operated a machine or worked with someone operating a machine in that time period. I’m not unusual among my programming peers. This is an outrageous state of affairs, and tells you everything you need to know about the effectiveness of all those layers of businessmen, managerial staff, supervisors, and resellers who have inserted themselves like slabs of toffee between those who write the software and those who use the software. Even if I wasn’t interested in operating a machine, someone should have forced me to spend some time making at least one thing to a standard of quality at some point in my career as it would have paid off enormously. "
- Shields Down. On digging into the real reason people quit jobs.
- Paul Graham is Still Asking to be Eaten. Maybe the reason startups get paid so well by VCs is that it's the only way to persuade them not to work on something more valuable to society...
December 28, 2015
Interesting Things on the Internet: December 28th 2015
- Let’s See What We Can Do: Designing Agency. Thoughful stuff, as ever, from Dan Lockton.
- a16z Podcast: London Calling for Tech Done in a Different Way with Russell Davies and Martha Lane Fox. Great thoughts on the challenges for tech and the opportunities for the UK in that, from Russell and Martha Lane Fox.
December 22, 2015
Guilty. Trying to do better.
I'm ashamed to say that too much of it rang true. Less so on the language side - there's some PHP-bashing in the Liverpool tech community, but personally at least, I'm language-agnostic enough that my general take is to use whichever language best suits your needs. I think people should generally be heading away from PHP for new developments, but beyond that any of Ruby/Python/Node JS work for most applications. Each have their niches to which they're better suited, but availability of developers and your existing knowledge of the language are equally important factors in that choice.
I think my unthinking contempt comes across in my lament of there not being enough "proper tech firms" in the area. The problem isn't with the agencies or firms using software/the 'Net to enable them to build better businesses, it's just tricky to pin down exactly what I mean and a disdain for agencies, etc. is a lazy shorthand because I can't express things properly.
I want there to be more people in the community doing interesting work in tech, pushing the boundaries of what's possible, or at least keeping up with where the boundaries are. I want more people in strategy meetings with the council and the LEP to be proposing projects that show they understand the real possibilities of digital.
What I want is to raise the level of ambition in Liverpool's tech and digital community. That will make it harder for some of the companies to put out a perfectly-passable app and laud it as ground-breaking innovation. It's not about making their lives harder, it's about recognising that the really exciting work is harder than that and building a community that rewards technical talent rather than marketing talent. Successful businesses do need marketing and sales, but to compete in a global marketplace that needs to be built on a foundation of solid tech.
We aren't going to attract the best technologists to the city if we're showcasing run-of-the-mill companies. We need to find ways to help the existing companies get better, help us good technologists (he says snobbishly assuming he's one of them) find each other, and educate the support organisations (including the council, LEP, etc.) to recognise good tech over good bullshit (to pick extremes).
And I'm going to try to be less down on agencies and to continue to strive for better ways to explain what I really mean.
December 21, 2015
Fourteen years and still this time of year feels a bit dislocated. Moments like the one on Thursday night when mid-Christmas-party the club we were in played The Smiths' There is a light that never goes out... Which always makes me think of Karen and Stewart, it just jars more set against the festivities. Not that there's anything wrong with the feelings.
This year it would have been great to share my discovery of Outfit. They've had a reasonable amount of radio airplay, although not as much as they deserve. I first properly became aware of them when I went to their second album launch gig at the Kazimier in the summer - I recognised some of their first album when I heard it, but couldn't name it beforehand.
I've since bought both albums although I think the second one is the stronger of the two. My favourite track is Smart Thing, although the whole album sums up the summer for me.
And in another quirk of fate, a couple of hours before I was in a club listening to The Smiths on Thursday, I shared a karaoke booth with Outfit's lead singer...
Interesting Things on the Internet: December 21st 2015
- Passphrases That You Can Memorize — But That Even the NSA Can’t Guess. How, and when, to use really secure passwords.
- Happy Fifty Years, Gentrification! ... Does Gentrification Gentrify without Gentrifiers?
- An Unbelievable Story of Rape.
- Can they? By the time this is published the title should read "Did they?" as Spain goes to the polls on the 20th. Still, an interesting look at the Podemos movement.
December 14, 2015
Interesting Things on the Internet: December 14th 2015
- Social Media Snakepits & Solidarity Versus Corporate Shafting, UK 2015.
- Ada’s List: meet the female tech workers reclaiming the sector. More of this sort of thing please.
- When is it time to start a revolution? My answer, I'm not sure, but something needs to change.
- ‘Superficial’ relationships: near-strangers, weak ties, and older men. Kevin Harris on good form around community and neighbourliness.
- On winning the Turner Prize. It's lovely to see the hard work the Granby community have put in over years being recognised (albeit in a roundabout manner). So I now live ~5 minutes walk from a Turner prize-winning artwork. And I've also exhibited alongside the Turner prize-winning artists - Assemble were part of the Build Your Own exhibition that we (as DoES Liverpool) made Desktop Prosthetics for.
- Turner Prize – truth behind the Toxteth terraces. Following on from the previous link, this does a decent job of showing the backstory to the Granby 4 Streets project.
- So you want to reform democracy. Find the right ways to build civic tech.
- Software has diseconomies of scale - not economies of scale. At least until it's written, then it scales massively.